Securities Analysis
Why Fabrica property tokens are not classified as securities.
The Fabrica Trust agreement is explicitly designed so that Property Tokens do not constitute securities under U.S. federal or state securities laws. This page explains the reasoning behind that structure.
The Howey Test
Under U.S. law, the primary test for whether something is a security is the Howey Test (from SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 1946). An instrument is a security if it involves:
- An investment of money
- In a common enterprise
- With an expectation of profits
- Derived from the efforts of others
All four elements must be present. The Fabrica Trust is designed to fail multiple prongs of this test.
How the Fabrica Token Structure Avoids Securities Classification
No Common Enterprise
Each Property Token represents a single, specific property. There is no pooling of assets, no shared revenue, and no common fund. Token holders are individual property owners, not investors in a collective venture.
No Expectation of Profits From Others' Efforts
The token holder is the beneficial owner of the property with full control. Any value appreciation comes from the real estate market, not from Fabrica's efforts. The token holder:
- Makes all decisions about the property
- Bears all costs (taxes, maintenance, insurance)
- Receives all income
- Can use, sell, lease, or develop the property independently
Fabrica provides infrastructure (the protocol, the trust template, validation services) but does not manage properties, make investment decisions, or generate returns for token holders.
Direct Ownership, Not an Investment Contract
The Property Token is a mechanism for holding and transferring property ownership. It functions more like a deed than like a share of stock. The token holder has the same rights as any traditional property owner: possession, control, exclusion, enjoyment, and disposition.
UCC Characterization Is Separate
The trust agreement includes provisions under UCC Article 8 and UCC Article 12 to enable the token to be used as collateral. The agreement explicitly states that these UCC characterizations:
- Are for collateral perfection purposes only
- Do not constitute an admission that the token is a security
- Have no bearing on whether the token is a security under federal or state securities law
This separation is important: UCC treatment as a "financial asset" or "controllable electronic record" serves a different legal purpose than securities classification.
Regulatory Approach
Fabrica holds 23 regulatory licenses and operates across all 50 U.S. states with varying degrees of functionality. The licensing approach is based on the token being a property ownership instrument, not a security.
Notably, the California Board of Equalization has confirmed that "a transfer of the Fabrica Token is a transfer of the underlying real property itself" -- treating the token as a property conveyance mechanism rather than a financial instrument.
Limitations
This analysis reflects the current understanding of U.S. securities law as applied to the Fabrica Trust structure. Property owners should be aware that:
- Securities law is complex and evolving, particularly as it applies to digital assets
- This page is informational and does not constitute legal advice
- The SEC has not issued specific guidance on tokenized real property
- Property owners considering large-scale tokenization or marketing tokens to investors should consult securities counsel
The Fabrica Trust agreement states: "It is the intent of the parties that the Property Token shall not be a security for purposes of US federal securities law (including the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934), California securities laws, or any other applicable state, local, or foreign securities laws."
Updated 5 days ago
